MindSave Official Website › Label Desk › Two Published Ingredient Lists, And One Of Them Contains Caffeine

Two Published Ingredient Lists, And One Of Them Contains Caffeine

By The Mindsaves Editorial Desk · Reviewed September 19, 2026 · 7 min read · Reading a label

This is the least convenient thing this desk knows about the product it sells, and it is printed here because somebody who avoids stimulants needs it before a pricing table rather than after a first capsule.

What is actually in front of this desk

Three pieces of the seller’s own artwork name ingredients, and this website holds all three.

Two of them are listing panels, the kind that sit inside a product listing under headings such as how it works and inside the formula. Between them they print six names: niacin, vitamin B6, GABA, L-tyrosine, bacopa monnieri and alpha GPC. No amounts, no blend line, no stimulant. They agree with the sales page and with the supplier pack this desk was given, which together name eight: the same six plus phosphatidylserine and huperzine A.

The third is a flat label image, the artwork a printer would use. It carries a complete Supplement Facts panel with milligrams on it, and the formula it describes is not the eight. It names thiamin and vitamin B12, which the sales page never mentions, and a proprietary blend built around caffeine from green coffee, theacrine and theobromine, together with L-tyrosine, bacopa and rhodiola. GABA, alpha GPC, phosphatidylserine and huperzine A do not appear on it at all.

Read off the seller’s own material. The figures on the third row are withheld here on purpose, because quoting them would amount to asserting that formula as the contents of the bottle.

What this desk will not do, and the sentence that matters instead

The tempting move is to count sources. Three agree, one does not, therefore the eight names win and the awkward image is an error. This website does carry the eight, for exactly that reason, and it is worth being clear about how weak a reason it is. Three pieces of artwork against one is a count of pictures. Nobody at this desk has opened a bottle from this month’s production and read the panel on it.

So neither list is asserted here as the contents, and no figure from the disputed panel is repeated anywhere on this website as what a capsule holds.

Saying that a discrepancy exists is almost useless to the person who needs it. The sentence that does the work is shorter and blunter: one of the two published ingredient lists contains caffeine. Somebody who has been told to keep off stimulants can act on that. Nobody can act on the word discrepancy.

The three names, in plain terms

Caffeine is the stimulant in coffee, tea and cola. On the disputed panel it is described as coming from green coffee bean extract, which is the unroasted bean; the source changes the extract, not the compound.

Theobromine is the related compound that gives cocoa its mild lift, and it is why chocolate is a stimulant at all.

Theacrine is a third member of the same chemical family, sold in supplements for the same reason as the other two. It is less familiar because it is less common, not because it is inert.

That is as far as this page goes on pharmacology, because the practical point does not depend on it. Anyone who avoids one of those three is generally avoiding all three, and the reason a person avoids them is usually more specific than the compound: a blood pressure they are watching, a sleep problem they have finally got hold of, a heart rhythm, or an instruction from somebody who knows their history.

Who this actually matters to

For most buyers this is a curiosity. For the following readers it is the deciding fact about the purchase, and it belongs in front of them before a price.

• Anyone who has been told to cut stimulants, for blood pressure, for a heart rhythm, for anxiety or for sleep. The instruction was about a compound, and a compound does not care which list it appears on.
• Anyone pregnant or nursing. This product is for healthy adults aged 18 and over and is not for pregnancy or nursing in any case, and caffeine intake is a question that gets asked in that period for its own reasons.
• Anyone who already takes a pre-workout, a fat burner or a focus product. Stimulants stack across products, and a capsule whose stimulant content is disputed is a poor addition to a total nobody is tracking.
• Anyone who sleeps badly. A once-daily capsule taken late in the day is a different proposition depending on which of the two lists is in it.
• Anyone taking prescription medication. Supplements and medicines can interact in both directions, and the starting point for that conversation is a list of names. Bring the bottle, because the panel on it is the document that settles which list applies.

This is also on the side effects page and on the who it is for page, in different words, because a fact that only appears where a label is discussed reaches the wrong reader.

What a buyer actually does about it

1. Open the carton before the first capsule, not after the tenth. The Supplement Facts panel is on the bottle and it is the only document that describes the object in your hand.
2. Read the ingredient rows for the three names above. They would appear on a blend line if they appear at all, and a blend line has to be identified as one with its total weight declared.
3. If the panel is not what you expected, stop and ring order support on +1 (302) 200-3480. That call starts a return, and a parcel posted back without one is hard to match to a payment.
4. Use the window. The seller’s guarantee runs 60 days from purchase and takes the bottles back even when they are empty. That is the recourse, and it is why a mismatch is recoverable rather than a loss.
5. If you avoid stimulants on medical advice, ask the person who gave it. Take the bottle with you. A panel in a hand beats a description over a phone.

The guarantee, in the seller’s own words: “Try MindSave for a full 60 days. If you don’t feel sharper, more focused, and clearer-headed, or you’re not happy for any reason, just send back the bottles, even empty ones, and we’ll refund every penny. No questions asked.” Quoted from the seller’s own page, read 19 September 2026. The guarantee page sets out the return route, the address and the two clocks a refund runs on.

What would actually settle it

Three things would end this, and none of them is available to this desk today.

A laboratory assay of a bottle bought from the current checkout would settle the contents outright. That costs real money per sample, it tests one bottle from one lot, and this website will not publish a certificate it has not read.

A photograph of the printed panel from a bottle bought this month would settle which artwork is in production, and it is the cheapest of the three. Anyone who has one is welcome to send it to this desk; corrections change the page and move the review date at the foot of it.

The seller publishing the panel on the sales page would settle it before the sale, which is where a buyer would rather have it.

Until one of those happens the honest position is the one printed at the top of this page: two published lists, one of them carrying a stimulant, neither asserted here, and the panel on your own bottle as the document that decides. The label page carries the same finding beside the artwork itself, and the piece on proprietary blends explains what the blend line on that artwork is.